You are reading this because you looked at Nintendo’s stock chart recently and felt your stomach drop into your shoes. The stock has been tumbling in early 2026, dropping around 15.6% year-to-date.

Naturally, you assume the big, bad hedge funds are shorting it into oblivion. I am here to tell you that you are dead wrong. In fact, the short interest ratio is practically non-existent. Recent data from the OTC markets shows short interest sits at roughly 0.0% of shares.

The short interest volume actually plummeted by 43.5% in March. Borrow rates for short sellers are hovering between a measly 1.01% and 4.08%. If hedge funds were aggressively betting against Mario, those borrow fees would be skyrocketing.

So, if the shorts are not killing Nintendo, what is?

First, Nintendo slashed Switch 2 production targets from 6 million to 4 million units for the current quarter.

Second, memory component costs have exploded, with LPDDR5X RAM prices jumping 41%.

Finally, Wall Street is terrified of a Google AI model called Genie 3 that supposedly makes game developers obsolete.

We will tear all of this apart below..

The Fake Bear Cases:

Nintendo Switch 2 is a bust?

Currently, the narrative is turning sour because of the Switch 2 transition. The original Switch is long in the tooth. Sales are naturally declining.

The Switch 2 has launched, but the early sales figures are not meeting the hyper-optimistic Wall Street expectations. The company cut their production target from 6 million to 4 million units for the quarter. This caused weak-handed retail investors to panic and sell.

Adding fuel to the fire is Google DeepMind’s Project Genie 3. This AI model can supposedly generate playable video game worlds from simple text prompts in real-time. Tech journalists are screaming that the 200 billion USD gaming industry is dead.

Gaming stocks plunged as a result. Unity software dropped 35%. Nintendo caught the contagion and saw its stock drop 4.75% in a single session.

It’s a weird feeling of deja-vu when I hear this… People claimed mobile games would kill console gaming a decade ago. Nintendo responded by releasing the Switch and selling over 140 million units.

The current panic over the Switch 2 transition is entirely predictable. Every single time Nintendo launches a new console, analysts predict doom. They did it with the DS, they did it with the Wii, and they did it with the original Switch.

AI will make Nintendo obsolete

This is the most widely discussed risk, and it is also the stupidest. In January 2026, Google DeepMind released Project Genie 3. The market completely lost its mind over a tech demo.

• The Tech: Genie 3 generates real-time, navigable 3D environments from text or image prompts.

• The Specs: It outputs at 720p resolution and 24 frames per second.

• The Features: It allows basic interactive physics, like jumping and swimming.

Why pay hundreds of developers for five years to build a Zelda game when an AI can generate one in five seconds? Gaming stocks nose-dived across the board.

Unity dropped 35% in a single day. Analysts downgraded the entire sector, claiming high-fidelity interactive content generation would erode the AAA studio moat. Even major Korean publishers like NCSoft had to release statements defending their business models.

Let me explain why this is pure, unadulterated garbage. Genie 3 generates visual environments, not video games. A video game is not just a landscape you walk around in aimlessly.

A Nintendo game is defined by meticulous, obsessively tuned gameplay loops. It is the exact friction of Mario’s jump. It is the perfectly balanced level design of a Mario Kart track.

An AI hallucinating a pixelated forest cannot replicate the intentionality of Shigeru Miyamoto’s level design. Genie 3 struggles heavily with multi-agent scenarios and lacks full gameplay features. It is a prototyping tool, not a game engine replacement.

Furthermore, Nintendo sells characters, not just pixels. People do not want to play “Generic AI Platformer 7.” They want to play as Mario.

AI cannot generate copyrighted intellectual property without facing a nuclear lawsuit from Nintendo’s legal team. The market is conflating the automation of background asset generation with the obsolescence of creative game design. It is a fundamental misunderstanding of the industry.

Competition is killing Nintendo?

Let us compare Nintendo directly to its closest peers. Look at Sony Group Corporation (6758.T). Sony is an incredible company, but their gaming strategy is fundamentally different from Nintendo’s.

Sony focuses heavily on the hardcore, premium audience. They build massive, hyper-expensive machines like the PlayStation 5 Pro. They rely on bleeding-edge graphics to sell their products.

This is a dangerous game. It requires massive capital expenditures. It also puts them in direct competition with high-end PC gaming and Microsoft’s Xbox.

Sony’s financial metrics actually reflect a highly successful, albeit different, strategy. Following the spin-off of Sony Financial Group in October 2025, their balance sheet is pristine. They sit on roughly 2.09 trillion JPY in cash against 1.03 trillion JPY in debt, operating with a robust net cash position.

Their Game and Network Services division is also massively profitable. It pulled in a record 140.8 billion JPY in operating income during Q3 FY2025. However, Sony remains a massive conglomerate relying heavily on third-party software and bleeding-edge hardware.

Nintendo does not play this game. They focus on the mass market and casual gamers. You do not buy a Nintendo console for the graphics.

You buy a Nintendo console because it is the only legal way on earth to play Mario, Zelda, and Pokemon. That is the moat. Their intellectual property is impenetrable.

You can have all the processing power in the world, but if your kid wants to play Mario Kart, you are buying a Nintendo. This gives them incredible pricing power. Nintendo rarely discounts their first-party games, even years after release.

Furthermore, Nintendo is actively expanding beyond video games. They are finally monetizing their IP in the broader entertainment world. They just launched The Super Mario Galaxy Movie and even though it has been hammered by critics, it is is performing exceptionally well, becoming the biggest global box office hit of 2026 so far. They also have a live-action Legend of Zelda movie slated for May 2027. They even launched subsidiaries like Nintendo Pictures to keep this content production in-house.

This creates a self-sustaining flywheel. You watch the Mario movie. You buy the Mario game.

You visit the Super Nintendo World theme park. You buy the plush toy. Every piece of media feeds into the core software business.

Competitors simply cannot replicate this. Microsoft can buy Activision Blizzard for 69 billion USD, but they cannot buy cultural relevance. Master Chief does not sell theme park tickets like Mario does.

You might argue that Microsoft bought cultural relevance when they acquired Minecraft. You are completely right that Minecraft is a global phenomenon. However, Microsoft never figured out how to connect Minecraft to them, because there is no synergy between them and Minecraft.

So you end up with even Nintendo’s richest competitor failing to become a threat. Master Chief does not sell theme park tickets, and Steve from Minecraft does not force anyone to buy an Xbox.

This is the ultimate competitive advantage.

Nintendo’s finances are weak?

Yes, there was a big drop last quarter. Revenue fell by an ugly 30.3% year-over-year.

This reflects the death throes of the original Switch lifecycle. When hardware sales stall, software sales follow suit. The market looked at this 46.6% drop in operating profit and completely lost its mind.

However, look at the underlying profitability. Even in a terrible transition year, they generated a gross margin of 60.96%. Their operating margin sat at a very healthy 24.26%.

Many tech companies would kill for a 24% operating margin in their best years. Nintendo achieved it during their worst.

For FY3/26, analysts expect a massive rebound. UBS projects revenues of 2,256.8 billion JPY and an operating profit of 345.0 billion JPY. Mizuho is slightly more optimistic, forecasting 2,310 billion JPY in revenue and 385.0 billion JPY in operating profit.

Perhaps even more impressive is Nintendo’s balance sheet.

They could literally stop selling video games tomorrow and fund their operations for decades just by burning through their cash pile. This massive cash position is a double-edged sword. It essentially puts a hard floor on the stock price. However, it is highly inefficient from a capital allocation standpoint. A western company would leverage up and buy back shares aggressively.

Nintendo prefers to hoard cash like a dragon. They recently announced a minor share buyback program for up to 14 million shares, or roughly 100 billion JPY. This is a step in the right direction, but it is a drop in the bucket compared to their total reserves.

The Genuine Threats:

Too expensive to make the Switch 2?

This is the most legitimate threat to Nintendo’s short-term profitability. The bill of materials for the Switch 2 is skyrocketing. It is a genuine headache for management.

• DRAM Costs: The 12GB LPDDR5X modules used in the Switch 2 have seen a massive 41% price increase this quarter.

• NAND Costs: The 256GB NAND flash storage has risen by roughly 8%.

• UBS Estimate: Total cost increase for FY3/27 could reach 81 billion JPY.

Nintendo’s entire hardware philosophy relies on using cheap, commoditized components. This sudden spike in memory pricing destroys their hardware margins. They are used to making a profit on day one, not taking a loss like Sony or Microsoft.

Nintendo has a choice. They can eat the cost and compress their profit margins. Or, they can raise the retail price of the console and risk angering consumers.

Neither option is great. If they raise the price, they risk alienating their core casual audience. Shuntaro Furukawa, Nintendo’s president, stated they are monitoring the situation closely but hope to avoid a price hike for now.

However, memory markets are highly cyclical. Contract memory prices are already showing early signs of stabilization outside of China. Nintendo is also diversifying its supply chains to Vietnam to avoid US tariff impacts.

I view this margin squeeze as a temporary headache, not a permanent impairment. They have the cash to weather a few bad quarters of hardware margins. It will not break the company.

No good games?

The Switch 2 needs killer games to move hardware. Right now, the visibility is incredibly murky.

• Pokemon Pokopia: Estimated 3.5 million shipments in Q4, performing well but needs to hold momentum.

• Mario Kart World: Rapid shipment deceleration, with UBS predicting only 1.5 million shipments in Q4.

• Upcoming Exclusives: Pokemon Winds & Waves is not slated until 2027.

If Nintendo does not announce a massive lineup of first-party titles soon, hardware sales will stagnate. Investors are desperately waiting for the next Nintendo Direct presentation. They need to see titles like the new 3D Mario or the rumored Fire Emblem: Fortune’s Weave.

A weak pipeline is the fastest way to kill a console launch. The Wii U failed largely because of software droughts. If Nintendo repeats that mistake, the stock will bleed further.

Conclusion: Buying the Panic

In this analysis, I have established that the short sellers are practically non-existent. I have also established that Google’s Genie 3 is a hallucinating prototype, not a replacement for creative game design. The true headwinds are entirely cyclical, stemming from elevated RAM costs and a sparse early release schedule for the Switch 2.

Wall Street is notorious for punishing cyclical transition years in the hardware business. They look at a trailing P/E ratio of 24.5x and assume the stock is heavily overvalued. They are completely ignoring the fact that a massive portion of Nintendo’s market capitalization is just cash sitting in a vault.

When you back out the 2.29 trillion JPY in net cash, you are buying the core operating business at a steep discount. You are buying a premier entertainment monopoly that owns the childhoods of multiple generations. You are paying a discounted multiple for Mario, Zelda, and a business model that captures margin at every single step.

This is the essence of value investing. You buy a phenomenal business when temporary friction causes weak-handed investors to panic. The margin of safety is built entirely on that cash pile and the unbreakable strength of their intellectual property.

I do not care if memory prices compress margins for a quarter or two. I care about the recurring software revenue and console adoption over the next decade. Buy the dip, collect the dividend, and wait for the market to wake up to reality.

You all voted for this. I asked the readers of KonichiValue to pick the next deep dive for our 2026 undervaluation series, and you collectively decided to force me to write about small dirt-digging machines.

I have to admit a bit of personal bias here. I used to work in the construction industry in Sweden, so I know more than the average stock picker what construction workers think, how they act, and what makes them curse at a piece of equipment and kick its treads in utter frustration.

Takeuchi is a really quirky gem. It is the company that effectively invented the compact excavator in 1971 and the compact track loader in 1986. Yet, it remains relatively obscure to mainstream global investors who are too busy throwing their money at the recognizable yellow paint of Caterpillar (CAT) or the massive mining rigs of Komatsu (6301.T).

Takeuchi operates with a market capitalization of roughly JPY 319 billion, which translates to around USD 2 billion. It has a bulletproof balance sheet with absolutely zero debt. It generates operating margins that rival the biggest players in the industry, and it treats its shareholders with increasing respect through aggressive buybacks and a rising dividend payout ratio.

However, the macroeconomic environment is quite hostile right now. The United States accounts for a massive 55% of Takeuchi’s total revenue. The US housing market is suffocating under high interest rates, equipment financing rejections are spiking, and protectionist US tariffs (even though they might go away soon) are taking a massive bite out of gross margins for Japanese exporters.

In this exhaustive report, I will break down the narrative, performance, competitors and most importantly, if Takeuchi is a certified KonichiValue Buy stock or if it should stay hidden in the dirt.

Grab a coffee, because we are going to get deep into the mud:

Executive Summary

Read more

Last week, I wrote about the inevitable destruction of thousands of incredibly successful businesses and unique Japanese craftsmen, all disappearing because of the succession crisis:

The gist of it is that by 2025, two thirds of Japan’s small and medium-sized enterprises face extinction simply because their aging founders have no one to take over the business.

But is it really inevitable?

Meet the potential savior, M&A Capital Partners (MACP).

MACP makes absolute fortunes by convincing these stubborn, old-school CEOs to sell their life’s work instead of shutting it down.

How much you may ask?

Enough to pay their consultants more than any other company in Japan, at an average of 31.6 million yen ($208,000) a year. While that figure might not rival the astronomical heights of Wall Street or Silicon Valley, it’s nearly seven times higher than the average Japanese salary of 4.6 million yen ($30,000).

History

Establishing the firm initially in Shinjuku, Tokyo, Nakamura recognized a fundamental flaw in the Japanese corporate advisory landscape. Traditional investment banking methods were far too clinical to handle the immense psychological baggage of these old-school and stubborn Japanese SME owner.

Prior to MACP, the Japanese M&A intermediary industry relied almost exclusively on a passive referral-based business model. Rival firms waited for regional banks and accounting firms to refer distressed or retiring clients to them. This referral model captures owners only after they have already surrendered to the idea of selling. The M&A intermediary is also forced to pay hefty kickbacks back to the financial institution, destroying profit margins.

Nakamura engineered a paradigm shift by instituting a Direct Proposal business model. MACP’s elite consultants aggressively approach the owners of highly profitable mid-to-large-cap SMEs directly.

This strategy requires an astonishing level of audacity. It involves cold-approaching a proud and defensive Showa-era (the Japanese word for Boomer) CEO and introducing the deeply taboo subject of selling his life’s work. When executed correctly, it yields extraordinary results.

Through nuance and empathy, MACP helps these stubborn owner-managers discover that M&A is a highly viable, honorable mechanism for preserving the company’s legacy. By uncovering these latent needs before the owner even realizes they want to sell, MACP completely bypasses referral fees and secures exclusive access to much larger enterprises.

To soften the ground for their consultants, MACP deployed a brilliant, emotionally resonant marketing campaign called the “Lion President”.

The “Lion President” is a heavily dramatized character used in a nationwide television advertising blitz to represent the persona of the isolated owner-president. The campaign compares a weary corporate executive to a lion, portraying the animal as a pride leader forced to fight its most brutal battles in complete solitude.

But by giving up his pride, the lion can unlock wealth and spend time with what really matters:

Airing prominently on major business networks like TV Asahi and TV Tokyo, the campaign has spanned 17 different commercial iterations. With poignant titles like “Lonely President” and “President and Senior,” the commercials strike directly at the psychological heart of the target demographic.

The message worked extremely well for its target audience. It validates their feelings of isolation and reframes the act of selling as the final, noble act of a strong leader ensuring the survival of his pride instead of something to be ashamed about.

Since the introduction of the TV commercials in 2018, MACP’s number of active deals has nearly tripled.

How to make Japanese founders trust you

Closing a multi-million dollar transaction requires a financial architecture that the highly skeptical CEO can trust. MACP pioneered a “Fair M&A” framework built on absolute transparency.

MACP instituted a strict No Commencement Fee policy. Competitors routinely charge massive upfront retainers just to begin a preliminary corporate valuation. MACP allows owners to consult and progress all the way to a basic agreement entirely free of charge.

The true disruptive genius of MACP’s model lies in its application of the “Lehman Formula” for calculating success fees. Competitors typically calculate their fee based on total assets moved, charging their percentage against the company’s equity plus all of its outstanding debt. MACP calculates its fee strictly on share value, entirely excluding the company’s debt load from the calculation.

The financial difference for the retiring CEO is staggering. Here is a comparison using a theoretical SME with 2 billion yen in total assets (1.5 billion yen in debt and 500 million yen in equity):

• Competitor Model (Total Assets Formula): Calculates the fee based on 2.0 Billion Yen (Equity plus Debt). The success fee charged is 75 Million Yen. This exorbitant fee strips value from the final payout.

• MACP Model (Share Value Lehman Formula): Calculates the fee based on 500 Million Yen (Equity Only). The success fee charged is 25 Million Yen. This fee is cut by two-thirds and preserves the seller’s wealth.

MACP strictly applies the exact same fee structure to both the seller and the buyer. Buyers operate with a fixed total acquisition budget. If a brokerage charges the buyer an exorbitant fee, the buyer inevitably lowers the actual purchase price offered to the seller. By keeping buyer fees identical and low, MACP actively protects the seller’s final net proceeds.

Japan’s highest paying company

Executing this direct-proposal model requires a workforce of unparalleled skill. To attract this elite talent pool, MACP has engineered a compensation structure that is the absolute envy of the Japanese corporate world.

The National Tax Agency reports the average private-sector salary for regular employees hovers at a modest 4.95 million yen.

For ten consecutive years, MACP has held the undisputed title of the highest-paying listed company in Japan.By 2025, the average annual salary at MACP was 31.6 million yen.

This stratospheric compensation is the result of a hyper-aggressive, performance-linked bonus structure designed to reward pure execution.

Also, MACP boasts the highest ratio of certified professionals among consultants in the entire M&A intermediary industry. As of late 2025, over 13.4% of the consultant workforce held advanced professional licenses, including 25 Certified Public Accountants, 3 corporate lawyers, and 2 judicial scriveners.

Each MACP consultant generated an astonishing average of 107.73 million yen in revenue and 42.35 million yen in ordinary profit for the firm as of the end of 2025.

M&A Capital Partners (6080.T) stock analysis

I think MACP is really interesting, and helping perhaps Japan’s most urgent issue. But how is it to own the company?

First, the Japanese M&A intermediary market is effectively an oligopoly dominated by a few massive publicly listed players. While referral giants like Nihon M&A Center process an enormous volume of low-margin micro-transactions tethered to regional banks, MACP actively hunts whales using a direct proposal model.

Roughly 1 in 4 of MACP’s completed transactions are classified as large deals generating commissions exceeding 100 million yen. This high-margin focus allows MACP to offer the highest compensation in the country, providing an unparalleled defensive moat against the severe talent retention issues currently plaguing its competitors.

The results speak for themselves: According to the 2025 LSEG M&A Market League Tables, MACP achieved the absolute #1 ranking in Domestic Deals, Japan-Related Completed Deals, and Japan-Related Announced Deals.

Q1 FY2026 earnings

At first glance, MACP’s Q1 FY2026 consolidated financial results look grim. Revenue decreased by 19.7% (5,876 million yen), and operating profit dropped by 35.6% (2,215 million yen).

A nearly 36% drop in operating profit signals a fundamental flaw. However, this contraction is a classic optical illusion caused by a year-over-year tax-law anomaly. In Q1 FY2025, a massive concentration of high-value deals was rushed to close before a new minimum tax system took effect, creating an unsustainable hurdle rate for average fees per deal.

Underlying operations remain remarkably strong. The total number of closed deals actually increased year-over-year to 62. The revenue dip was entirely a function of deal size, large deals decreased from 21 to 16, while smaller mid-market deals surged from 32 to 46. Because MACP’s compensation model is heavily weighted toward performance-linked bonuses, expenses flexed downward perfectly alongside revenue. Cost of sales dropped 9.9%, while fixed SG&A remained flat.

The balance sheet is a fortress. With total assets of 53,058 million yen, an 81.5% equity ratio, an Income After Tax Margin exceeding 20%, and effectively zero long-term debt, management rightly maintained their aggressive full-year forecasts.

Despite being an elite, high-quality business with decades of structural tailwinds, the current valuation doesn’t exactly scream value investment.

As of late March 2026, the metrics look like this:

• Close Price: 3,320.00 JPY

• Market Capitalization: 98.86B JPY

• P/E Ratio (TTM): 25.11x

• Dividend Yield: 2.17%

• Beta: 0.32

• ROE (Total Equity): 10.07%

I cannot justify paying a 25x multiple for a 10% ROE and a 2% yield. Buying at this level leaves a razor-thin margin of safety. While the analysts I’ve seen (UBS & Morgan Stanley) on the stock maintain unanimous Buy ratings, I view MACP as a fundamentally elite firm currently priced for perfection.

The KonichiValue Score: HOLD

MACP belongs firmly on your watchlist. It is a phenomenal business, but wait for broader market volatility to compress the multiple into true value territory before initiating a position.

Conclusion

The crisis facing Japan’s corporate sector is a tragedy. Behind the terrifying macroeconomic statistics are thousands of proud, aging patriarchs staring down the painful reality that their life’s work may not outlast them.

The Japanese culture making it so hard for these founder to sell, and their sons often unsuited for the brutal realities of corporate leadership have created an impassable emotional deadlock. Traditional spreadsheet-driven finance simply cannot solve this.

MACP recognized that empathy, and being able to speak to these founders with cultural fluency is far more valuable than just offering bags of cash. By pioneering the audacious direct proposal model, leveraging the empathetic psychology of the “Lion President” campaign, and ruthlessly protecting the seller’s final payout, allowed M&A to transform into the highest-paying enterprise in the nation.

As long as the Showa-era founders require a dignified bridge to the future, M&A Capital Partners will remain an absolutely essential pillar of Japan’s economic survival. This is what true Deep Value looks like.

Japan Inc. is facing a demographic time bomb.

The scale of what is happening to Japan’s corporate landscape is truly terrifying:

Read more

For decades, Tokyo was a haven for zombie companies kept alive by free money and complacent cross-shareholding structures. Those days are aggressively coming to an end…

Read more

Japan is frequently associated with lifetime employment, strict corporate hierarchies, and decades of stagnant wages. However, there are companies that definitely brea…

Read more

My parents are both getting close to their 70s, and thanks to me, they have a lot of Japanese equities. Now I am questioning if I should ask them to sell everything…

I recently read a deeply fascinating interview in Diamond.jp featuring Tatsuro Kiyohara, a man often described as Japan’s legendary salaryman investor. Over a 25-year career, he turned a single fund into 93 times its original value, amassing a personal fortune of over 90 billion yen in the process. He is a master of bottom-fishing and finding deep value where others see nothing.

However, his core message in the Diamond.jp piece is surprisingly doompilled: If you are over 70 years old, you have absolutely no reason to hold Japanese stocks right now.

Kiyohara summed up his view of the current Japanese stock market with one phrase: “A star shines brightest before it burns out.”

Read more

A Real Buy-and-Hold Portfolio for Japan

Today, I’m sharing my wife’s buy-and-hold portfolio. It’s a real-world example for anyone who wants to own great assets in Japan without the stress of active management.

Like some of you here, my wife wasn’t initially interested in finance. She was taught to hoard cash and rely on the national pension. To get her on board, I pointed out two harsh realities:

• With over 30% of Japan’s population aged 65 or older, relying on the state is a massive financial risk.

• As prices rise, uninvested cash loses purchasing power every single day.

She listened and started maxing out her NISA in 2022.

The way she sets up her portfolio is that I pitch individual Japanese value stocks for her approval, and she personally selects her funds.

My Wife’s Stock Portfolio:

Here it is mostly my strategy, and it is simple: I look for companies where the market overreacts to short-term noise and ignores long-term structural advantages.

Subscribe now

Read more

Stock Snapshot

• Ticker: TSE: 3923

• Sector: Software and IT Services (SaaS)

• Current Price: 882 JPY

• Market Capitalization: 318.1 billion JPY

• Trailing P/E Ratio: 26.5x

The SaaSocalypse is dragging wildly profitable Japanese software-as-a-service stocks down by 50 percent or more. The global story driving this panic is that AI will commoditize software, allowing anyone to build their own SaaS tools from scratch.

In the United States, there might be some truth to it…

But Japan is not the US. Japan currently ranks 31st globally in digital competitiveness. Right now, over 70% of manufacturing orders in Japan are still received via physical fax machines!

These companies do not have developers. They have an aging workforce that is actively hostile to changing their daily routines. The idea that a 60-year-old accounting manager in Osaka is going to sit down and vibe-code a secure, legally compliant, cloud-based expense reimbursement system is a pure Silicon Valley delusion…

In this environment of irrational market panic, I find Rakus (TSE: 3923) to be the most interesting stock in the entire Japanese technology sector. As a pure value investor, I look for heavy cash generation. I look for deep competitive moats. I look for mispriced equity.

Rakus checks every single box.

Executive Summary

Read more

You’re likely reading this because you’ve heard AI is making SaaS obsolete. This SaaSocalypse narrative has gutted Japanese software valuations, mirroring the carnage seen by US mega-SaaS companies like Salesforce (-24% YTD), Oracle (-22% YTD) or Atlassian (-50% YTD).

The fear has some merit. Individuals can now use AI to build near-identical functionality tools for their specific needs. For example, CNBC reporters with zero coding experience used Anthropic's Claude Code to build a functioning replacement of the advanced organization tool Monday.com in under an hour for less than $15!

For Japan, a country that has struggled to produce world-class software for decades, this looks like the final nail in the coffin, explaining why investors are sprinting for the exit.

However, the idea that SaaS is dead ignores how enterprises actually operate. While investors debates vibe coding and DIY apps, enterprises prioritize service level agreements and uptime above all. And in Japan this is even more true: Corporate culture here is far more conservative. Once a company decides on a software provider, they stay anchored to it.

In this report, I specifically look at the most promising SaaS companies in Japan. I analyze Sansan, Money Forward, Freee K.K., Rakus, and Bengo4.com. I will describe their businesses and detail how much they have fallen recently in the public markets. I will take the latest financial data and quarterly earnings reports to predict if these companies are truly victims of the SaaSocalypse or if they are insulated from the panic.

I will score each company from 1 to 5. My verdict takes into account their raw numbers, their core business vulnerability to artificial intelligence, their overall futureproof status, local competition, and their ability to succeed in a global market.

Executive Summary

The Macro Setup: A Divorced Market I look at the Japanese software market in 2026 and see an environment completely divorced from the United States. First, Japan faces a terminal demographic crisis; automation is baseline survival infrastructure. Second, the government is actively forcing digitalization to avoid the catastrophic economic losses of the 2025 Digital Cliff. Third, Japanese corporate culture relies heavily on consensus, creating agonizingly slow procurement cycles but resulting in near-zero churn once a vendor is embedded.

Japanese SaaS equities have lost 30% to 50% in less than a year because the market incorrectly assumes the AI-driven SaaSocalypse will destroy all software companies equally. I see this as a generational value investing setup. Underlying demand is actually accelerating due to severe labor shortages. The strategic play is to buy the monopolistic incumbents integrating AI to defend their moats, and strictly avoid those reliant on manual data entry or fickle micro-businesses.

Sector Coverage & Ratings

Read more

But after re-reading Thomas Piketty’s Capital, I think the real systemic disease is this: The return on capital (r) has outpaced economic growth (g) to such a degree that if you rely solely on a salary, you are becoming poorer each year.

But this is KonichiValue, and I focus on solutions. If the global game is rigged, is there a place where the math still works in your favor?

Enter Japan.

While the West drowns in service inflation and spiraling costs, Tokyo has emerged as an anomaly. It is the last developed market where the cost of a high-quality life has decoupled from the aggressive inflationary spirals of New York or London.

By applying a Piketty Mindset to the unique economic landscape of 2026 Japan, we can calculate a specific Financial Freedom Number, exactly how much capital you need to stop surviving and start living.

Executive Summary: The Tokyo Arbitrage

Read more

My recent report on Takashi Kotegawa,

,became one of my most shared articles ever.

In this video, I go deeper into the technical side of his “25-Day Moving Average Divergence” strategy that I outlined in the text. I break down the specific charts from the 2005 crash and the 2008 Lehman shock to show you exactly where he bought when everyone else was selling.

Executive Summary

Read more

I am trying something new today. I will put a claim I’ve heard time and time again to the test: The AI boom is hoarding all the me…

Read more

I have tasked myself with finding the greatest investor in Japan, and the search did not take long.

While there are others who have achieved fame in the retail space, most notably the brash and vocal CIS, there is only one undisputed god of the Japanese investing scene.

His name is Takashi Kotegawa, but the financial world knows him simply as B.N.F.

He is the man who turned his student savings of roughly 1.6 million yen into a fortune exceeding 30 billion yen ($272 million).

That’s a 1,874,900% total return!

He is the man who managed to make over 2 billion yen ($18.2 million) in 10 minutes during the most infamous trading mistake in Tokyo Stock Exchange history.

He is the man who bought a commercial building in Akihabara with cash simply because he had run out of things to do with his money.

Kotegawa grants almost no interviews. He has no social media presence. He does not sell courses. He does not want your money. He wants only to trade.

And to understand his life since he went silent in 2020, I have compiled the available traces of his career: Old 2-chan forum posts, his few media appearances from 2006, public tax records, and the analysis of the Japanese trading community.

This report is his story….

Part I: The Death of the Salaryman

To understand Kotegawa, I must first paint the picture of the Japan he emerged from.

The year was 2000. The world’s biggest bubble had burst a decade prior, and the Nikkei 225 was a graveyard of optimism. The great Japanese dream of the salaryman, a stable, respectable career with lifetime employment that had underpinned the social contract since 1945, was dying. Japan was sliding into the deflationary abyss that would come to define its “Lost Decades.”

For the generation coming of age in the late 1990s, the corporate ladder looked less like a path to security and more like a trap. The “shinjinrui” (new breed) of young Japanese were disillusioned. They saw their fathers sacrifice their lives for corporations that were now discarding them. They looked for an escape.

The Digital Big Bang

However, a quiet revolution was taking place beneath the surface of this economic stagnation. The Japanese government, desperate to revitalize the financial sector, executed the “Financial Big Bang.” A critical component of this was the liberalization of brokerage commissions in October 1999.

Before this moment, trading stocks was a rich man’s game. It was gated by high fees and telephone orders. You had to call a broker. You had to pay a significant percentage of your trade execution. It was slow. It was inefficient. It was exclusive.

Suddenly, online brokers like Matsui Securities, Rakuten Securities, and E*Trade Japan emerged. They offered low latency and, crucially, low commissions. They opened the gates of the Tokyo Stock Exchange to the general public.

It was the dawn of the “Net Trader.” Thousands of young men retreated to their bedrooms. They armed themselves with PCs and high-speed internet connections.

They were the first generation to see the market not as a mechanism for capital allocation, but as a massive multiplayer online game played for real money.

Takashi Kotegawa was one of them.

Part II: The Birth of B.N.F.

Takashi Kotegawa was born on March 5, 1978, in Ichikawa, Chiba Prefecture. His background is aggressively ordinary. This is important. No math prodigy from a prestigious academy. No heir to a financial empire. He was a student at Nihon University, an average university at best, enrolled in the Faculty of Law.

In a parallel universe, Kotegawa graduates. He passes the bar. He becomes a salaryman lawyer. He works 14-hour days for a steady paycheck. He commutes on the Tozai Line. He retires at 65.

In this universe, he found the stock market.

The year was 2000. Kotegawa was 21 years old. He had saved approximately 1.6 million yen (roughly $13,000 at the time) from rigorously saving money from his part-time jobs.

The Victor Niederhoffer Connection

Hooked by the relentless ad campaigns of the new internet trading era, Kotegawa entered the market just as a historic downturn began. The US Dot-com bubble had just burst, and it evaporated trillions of dollars in wealth, creating a global contagion that dragged the Nikkei down to levels not seen in nearly twenty years.

While panic selling turned the markets into a slaughterhouse, Kotegawa quietly opened his account.

Needing a handle for the internet forums where traders gathered to share ideas, he chose “B.N.F.” It was a phonetic error; he intended to use “V.N.F.” to honor Victor Niederhoffer, but because the Japanese language treats “V” and “B” almost identically, the misspelling stuck.

The choice was telling. Niederhoffer was an eccentric American squash champion and George Soros partner, but his edge was purely statistical. He believed that markets followed strict statistical rules, specifically, that if an asset price deviated too far from the average, it was mathematically bound to snap back. This approach made him one of the most successful fund managers on Wall Street.

But in 1997, the math stopped working. Niederhoffer bet heavily that the Thai market had fallen too far and had to rebound. It didn’t. In a single day, his fund was wiped out. He lost $130 million in equity, erased his clients’ savings, and was eventually forced to auction his personal art collection just to pay the bills.

Now why would a young student name himself after a man who lost it all?

I believe Kotegawa saw the distinction between the method and the execution. He adopted Niederhoffer’s core philosophy: Buying the panic dip because the math says it must bounce, but he treated the 1997 crash as the ultimate lesson in risk management: Do not trade on borrowed money!

By the time his graduation approached in 2001, the ¥1.6 million ($13,000) he had scraped together from years of part-time work had ballooned to ¥61 million (~$500,000). That represents an explosive 3,712% portfolio growth in just a single year.

He calculated that the opportunity cost of finishing school was simply too high. Every hour in a law lecture was costing him millions. So, with only a few credits remaining, he decided to drop out.

Part III: The Art of Catching Falling Knives

I have analyzed hundreds of trading strategies. Most are absolute nonsense. They are rigged to look perfect on past data just to hook gullible subscribers. Kotegawa’s is different.

It is brutally simple. It is also psychologically impossible for 99% of people to execute.

Kotegawa’s Trading Strategy

Kotegawa made his initial fortune between 2000 and 2004. These were dark years for Japanese equities. The Nikkei 225 slid from 20,000 to under 8,000.

Most retail investors try to pick bottoms based on hope. They buy a stock because it has fallen 50% and they think “it cannot go lower.”

It usually goes lower.

Kotegawa inverted this logic. He did not buy because he liked the company. He bought because the selling was emotional. He waited for the selling to reach a mathematical breaking point, measured by the 25-day Moving Average Divergence (kairi-ritsu in Japanese).

Think of the 25-day Moving Average (MA) as a rubber band. When the price pulls too far away from this average, it stretches tight. Eventually, it has to snap back.

The Sector Rules

Kotegawa knew one number didn’t fit all. A utility stock doesn’t stretch like a tech stock. Through obsessive watching, he found the “snap point” for every industry.

Based on his old posts, these were his rough rules (measured against the 25-day MA):

• Pharmaceuticals: Buy at a 5–10% drop.

• Electric Appliances: Buy at a 10–15% drop.

• Food / Retail: Buy at a 15–20% drop.

• Tech / Internet: Buy at a 20–30% drop.

• Speculative / Penny Stocks: Buy only after a 30–50% drop.

When a stock crashed past these lines, Kotegawa struck. He was catching falling knives.

But the genius wasn’t the entry; any fool can buy a crash. The genius was the exit.

As soon as the stock bounced, often just 2% or 3%, he sold. He didn’t wait for a full recovery to the moving average. He grabbed the “dead cat bounce” and got out.

He repeated these small wins thousands of times.

By the end of 2004, he had made his first billion yen (¥1.1 billion, or roughly $10 million). He had turned his starting cash into a 690x return.

Part IV: How to Make Two Billion in Ten Minutes

Every superhero has an origin story. Every trader has a defining trade.

For George Soros, it was breaking the Bank of England.

For Takashi Kotegawa, it was the Mizuho “Fat Finger” error of December 8, 2005.

This event is the reason I am writing this biography. It is the moment Kotegawa transcended from “successful day trader” to “national legend.”

The Error

The date was December 8, 2005. J-Com Co., Ltd., a recruitment service company, was listing on the “Mothers” (small-cap) board of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. It was supposed to be a routine IPO.

At 9:27 AM, a trader at Mizuho Securities received an order from a client to sell 1 share of J-Com for 610,000 yen.

The trader made a typographical error. It was a simple slip of the keyboard. He entered an order to sell 610,000 shares for 1 yen.

The computer system at the Tokyo Stock Exchange did not catch the error. There were no circuit breakers for this specific type of volume discrepancy at the time. The order went live.

To put this in perspective, J-Com only had 14,500 outstanding shares. Mizuho had just offered to sell forty-two times the entire existence of the company for less than a penny per share.

The Recognition

The stock price collapsed instantly.

Most traders stared at their screens in confusion. Was it a system glitch? Was the company bankrupt? Was it a fraud? Fear paralyzed the market.

Kotegawa did not freeze. He saw the anomaly. He did not know why it was happening, but he knew the math was impossible. He knew that 610,000 shares could not exist.

He bought.

He bought with both hands. He bought 7,100 shares.

Remember, there were only 14,500 shares in existence. Kotegawa had just purchased nearly half of the company’s float in a matter of seconds.

Other sharks began to circle. The famous Japanese day-trader CIS, Kotegawa’s friend and rival, also bought, securing about 3,300 shares.

Between them, these two kids in their bedrooms now owned the majority of a newly listed public company.

The Exit

Mizuho Securities realized the error. Panic ensued on the trading floor. They tried to cancel the order. The Tokyo Stock Exchange system did not allow the cancellation because their technology was so outdated. The order stood.

Desperate to cover the short position they had accidentally created, Mizuho began buying back the shares at any price. They had to close the hole they had dug.

The price rocketed.

Kotegawa sold. He dumped his shares into the frantic buying pressure of the very bank that had caused the crash.

By the end of the day, Kotegawa had netted a profit of approximately 2.2 billion yen (roughly $20 million).

He did this in roughly ten minutes

The Aftermath

The incident became known as the “J-Com Shock.” It cost Mizuho Securities roughly 40 billion yen. The head of the Tokyo Stock Exchange eventually resigned. It was a national scandal.

Kotegawa, however, was the face of the incident. The media dubbed him “J-Com Man.” He was 27 years old. He had made more money in ten minutes than the average Japanese worker earns in ten lifetimes.

When asked about it later, he simply said that he was “lucky” and that “anyone could have done it”.

This is false humility. Thousands of professionals saw the same screen. Only Kotegawa acted with that size and speed. He had prepared his mind for years to recognize anomalies, and when the biggest anomaly in history appeared, he did not hesitate.

Part V: The Curse of Scale

By 2008, Kotegawa’s assets had ballooned to over 21 billion yen (approx. $200 million). He was one of the wealthiest individuals in Japan, and he was still under 30.

The Problem of Scale

Success brings its own problems. When you have 100 million yen, you are a speedboat. You can enter and exit trades instantly. When you have 20 billion yen, you are an oil tanker.

Kotegawa began to move the market. If he tried to buy a small-cap stock, his own buying pressure would drive the price up, destroying his entry price. If he tried to sell, he would crash the stock.

He was forced to trade only the most liquid large-cap stocks: Softbank, Toyota, Nintendo, and the mega-banks. He had to lengthen his holding periods. He couldn’t snatch quick pennies anymore. He had to hold stocks for days.

What is so funny about his trading strategy is that he had zero interest in the actual businesses. In a rare TV interview, He admitted he had no clue what the companies he traded actually did, nor did he care about their earnings guidance. His only reality was the line on the chart.

Part VI: The Lifestyle of a Monk

Most billionaire biographies are catalogues of excess: yachts, vineyards, and private jets. Kotegawa’s list is blank.

This is the “quirk” that makes him a cult figure in Japan. In a culture that prizes humility, he is the monk of the market.

He has exactly one indulgence: A 400 million yen condo in Tokyo.

Yet, visitors (the few television crews who were allowed in around 2006) reported that the apartment was practically empty. There was no art on the walls. No designer furniture. Just the trading station with its multiple monitors.

Allegedly, he did buy his parents a Toyota Crown Majesta, the ultimate symbol of conservative Japanese success, but he doesn’t drive. He still takes the bicycle.

His biggest splurge, famously, was buying two Nintendo Wiis. One can assume he played them alone.

His diet consists almost exclusively of cup ramen and convenience store onigiri. He claims that eating a large meal makes him sleepy, which slows his reaction time. He avoids caffeine because it makes him jittery.

He famously said, “If you care about the money, you cannot make the right decisions.” He views money as a score in a video game.

Thinking about what money can buy invites emotion, and to Kotegawa, emotion is the enemy.

Part VII: The Lehman Crisis

The year 2008 was a test of fire for everyone. Kotegawa was not immune.

The Lehman Loss

In September 2008, Kotegawa made a rare misstep. He bet on the survival of Lehman Brothers. He bought the stock, assuming the US government would bail it out as they had done with Bear Stearns.

They did not. Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy.

Kotegawa lost approximately 700 million yen (roughly $7 million at the time).

In a rare display of emotion, he admitted to punching his computer monitors. He broke two of them. It is the only recorded instance of him losing his temper.

However, what defines him is not the loss, but the recovery.

In October 2008, right in the heart of the crisis, Kotegawa made a move that shocked the market.

He paid cash, approximately 9 billion yen, for a commercial building in Akihabara. The building was known as “Chomp Chomp Akihabara” at the time (it is now known as the AKIBA Cultures ZONE). The building was a 6-story hive of maid cafes and anime shops.

As the real estate market was collapsing, cash was king. Kotegawa, that had piles of cash finally used some to buy a distressed asset in Akihabara, the holy land of otaku culture.

It was the perfect hedge. As a fellow Otaku himself, he knew the building was undervalued. He knew he couldn’t day trade 20 billion yen forever, so he swapped volatility for rent. For ten years, he earned a massive yield that required zero mouse clicks.

By 2018, rumors suggest he sold it for 12 billion yen, capturing a 30% gain on top of the rent.

Part VIII: Where is He Now?

Since the sale of the Akihabara building, Kotegawa has largely vanished.

He appeared in the “shikiho” (Japan Company Handbook) substantial shareholder lists for a few years, popping up on the registries of companies like JVC Kenwood or Oricom. But recently, his name has become scarce.

There are rumors. Some say he fled to Singapore to escape taxes. Others claim he shifted to private equity. But that contradicts his deep attachment to his home turf.

The reality is likely simpler. As his friend and rival CIS once said: “He doesn’t trade for money. He trades because it is the only thing he knows how to do.”

He is almost certainly still in Tokyo, sitting in a different high-rise, likely worth well over 30 billion yen. He has probably switched to global macro or index futures, where his massive size doesn’t break the market.

He is a ghost. But every time the market crashes, every time there is a panic, every time the charts turn red and the world is screaming “Sell!”, I know he is there.

Appendix: The Kotegawa Archive

Profile

• Name: Takashi Kotegawa (小手川 隆)

• Handle: B.N.F (B-N-F)

• Born: March 5, 1978, Ichikawa, Chiba

• Education: Nihon University, Faculty of Law (Dropout)

• Key Asset: AKIBA Cultures ZONE (formerly Chomp Chomp Akihabara) - Sold approx 2018

Estimated Wealth Trajectory

• 2000: 1.6 Million JPY - Initial Capital from part-time jobs

• 2001: 61 Million JPY - The Bear Market Divergence Strategy begins

• 2002: 96 Million JPY - Compounding small gains

• 2003: 270 Million JPY - Market recovery begins

• 2004: 1.1 Billion JPY - First billion yen milestone

• 2005: 8.0 Billion JPY - The J-Com Shock Trade (+2.2B yen)

• 2006: 15.7 Billion JPY - Featured on TV (”Gaia no Yoake”)

• 2007: 18.5 Billion JPY - Continued growth despite volatility

• 2008: 21.8 Billion JPY - Lehman Loss (-700M), Real Estate Purchase (9B)

• 2018: ~30.0 Billion+ JPY - Sale of Akihabara building

• 2025: Unknown (Likely >30 Billion Yen)

Strategy Summary

• 25-Day Moving Average: Primary baseline for value

• Deviation Rate (Kairi): The buy signal; specific % drops trigger entry

• Volume: Confirmation of panic/capitulation

• RSI: Secondary confirmation of oversold conditions

• Sector Correlation: Buying the “Laggard” in a moving sector

Famous Trades

• J-Com (2005): The 2 billion yen windfall from the Mizuho error.

• Lehman Brothers (2008): Bought the dip just before bankruptcy. Lost ~700 million yen. Punched two monitors.

• Softbank (2005/2014): Repeatedly traded swings in Masayoshi Son’s volatile empire.

Sources

• Purple Trading. “Legends of Trading: Mysterious Trader from Japan - Takashi Kotegawa”.

• Japan Times. “Day traders fight for respect in Japan’s tough market” (Coverage of CIS and B.N.F).

• Pocket Option. “Takashi Kotegawa Review: The Legacy of a Trading Legend”.

• Binance Square. “Meet BNF — The Japanese Day Trading Legend”.

• Ultima Markets Academy. “Trading Strategy of BNF Takashi Kotegawa”.

• Wikipedia (FR). “B.N.F (Takashi Kotegawa)”.

• Reddit r/Japan & r/JapanFinance. Discussions on Takashi Kotegawa’s whereabouts and real estate holdings.

• YouTube. “Gaia no Yoake” (Dawn of Gaia) - TV Tokyo documentary featuring B.N.F (2006).

I’m writing this because a few readers recently flagged a technical issue. When attempting to upgrade their subscription or renew, they received a red error message saying “No such customer” (followed by a code).

This is a synchronization glitch between Substack and the payment processor, but I can get it fixed for you quickly.

If you are seei…

Read more

Is this a bubble?

With the Nikkei 225 closing at 53,847 and the TOPIX standing at 3,613, the ghosts of 1989 have returned to haunt Japan.

Recently, the Japanese stock market has gone hyperbolic around the hype around Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s “Sanaenomics,” the frenzy in semiconductor stocks, and the sheer thrill that ”Japan might be back!”

The temptation to declare the market too expensive and hoard cash is strong. After all, the psychological barrier of 50,000 has been breached, evoking memories of the asset bubble of 1989 where the Imperial Palace grounds were rumored to be worth more than California.

However, in this article, I argue that the “Bubble 2.0” narrative is fundamentally flawed. I think we are witnessing a rational re-rating driven by the end of deflation, structural corporate reform, and a geopolitical realignment that favors Japan. Unlike 1989, when investors paid 60 times earnings for 1% yields, today’s market offers a positive equity risk premium and balance sheets loaded with cash.

The Ghost of 1989

To understand where we are, we must first exorcise the ghost that haunts every conversation about Japanese equities: the 1989 bubble.

In 1989, the Nikkei 225 peaked at 38,915. At that moment, the market was trading at a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of over 60x. The earnings yield was less than 2%, while the risk-free rate (10-year JGB) was hovering around 6-7%. Investors were essentially paying for the privilege of losing money relative to bonds.

Fast forward to January 2026. The Nikkei is at 53,847. The index level is higher, yes, but the valuation multiple has collapsed. The forward P/E of the Nikkei is approximately 23.9x, and more importantly, the broader TOPIX index trades at a forward P/E of just 17.1x. We have seen a massive compression in multiples over the last 36 years, even as earnings per share (EPS) have compounded.

Key Comparison: The Tale of Two Peaks (1989 vs. 2026)

• Index Level (Nikkei 225):

  • 1989 Bubble Peak: ~38,915

  • Jan 2026: 53,847 (+38% higher)

• Valuation (Forward P/E):

  • 1989 Bubble Peak: ~60x - 70x

  • Jan 2026: 23.9x (Nikkei) / 17.1x (TOPIX) (Valuations have compressed by ~65%)

• Cost of Capital (10Y JGB Yield):

  • 1989 Bubble Peak: ~6.0%

  • Jan 2026: ~1.1% (Capital is significantly cheaper)

• Equity Risk Premium:

  • 1989 Bubble Peak: Negative (-4.4%)

  • Jan 2026: Positive (+4.7%) (The signal has inverted; you are paid to take risk)

The crucial insight here is the Equity Risk Premium (ERP). In 1989, the bond market offered a risk-free 6%, while stocks offered a volatile 1.6% earnings yield. It was irrational to hold stocks. Today, the 10-year JGB offers ~1.1%, while the TOPIX offers an earnings yield of roughly 5.85%. Investors are being paid a premium of nearly 475 basis points to take equity risk. This is a signal of deep, persistent skepticism that has yet to be fully priced out.

The CAPE Ratio Perspective

Robert Shiller’s Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings (CAPE) ratio provides another layer of comfort. In the late 1980s, Japan’s CAPE ratio reached astronomical levels, nearing 100x, the highest valuation of any equity market in history. Today, the CAPE for Japan sits in the low-to-mid 20s, significantly below the US market, which is now around a CAPE of 40x.

The “intrinsic value” of a market is ultimately the present value of its future cash flows. In 1989, the market was pricing in growth rates that were physically impossible to achieve. In 2026, the market is pricing in modest growth, despite a backdrop of massive fiscal stimulus and corporate reform.

Sanaenomics and the End of Deflation

The second pillar of my thesis is macroeconomic. The inauguration of Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has introduced a regime change that I believe the market has only partially discounted.

Sanaenomics is frequently compared to Abenomics, but as someone analyzing the legislative text, I see distinct differences. Abenomics was about defeating deflation through monetary velocity. Sanaenomics is about crisis management investment and strategic self-sufficiency. It is a wartime economy mindset applied to peacetime industrial policy.

I might not be a fan of the frivolous spending of Sanae Takaichi, but there is no denying that it is good for the stock market.

The ¥21.3 trillion ($136 billion) stimulus package approved in late 2025 is not a scattershot cash handout. It is highly targeted:

• Strategic Growth Investment (¥7.2 trillion): This capital is directed squarely at the commanding heights of the modern economy: AI, Semiconductors, and Defense. By subsidizing the capital expenditures (Capex) of major industrial firms, the government is effectively lowering their cost of equity and increasing their Return on Invested Capital (ROIC).

• Household Support (¥11.7 trillion): Sanaenomics addresses consumption with direct energy subsidies and cash handouts (¥20,000 per child). This is critical because it puts a floor under consumption during the transition to an inflationary environment.

For the value investor, this fiscal policy acts as a put option on the economy. The government has signaled it will not allow nominal GDP growth to stall. The Bank of Japan’s upgrade of FY2026 GDP growth to 1.0% is a direct result of this spending.

The End of Deflationary Psychology

For thirty years, cash was king in Japan because goods became cheaper tomorrow. That era is dead. Inflation is now sticky above 2%. The wage negotiations (Shunto) have resulted in hikes of over 5%. This “wage-price spiral” is actually the salvation of the Japanese equity market.

Why? Because inflation destroys the value of the massive cash piles held by Japanese corporations.

• The Hoarding Penalty: In a deflationary world, holding cash is an investment, so Japanese companies might have been seen as too conservative for hoarding cash, but it was actually a good strategy. In a 2% inflation world, a company with 40% of its assets in cash (a common profile in the Standard Market) is destroying shareholder value by 2% annually in real terms.

• The Behavioral Shift: Inflation forces management to do something with the cash, invest it (Capex) or return it (dividends/buybacks). We are seeing this shift in real-time.

Corporate Governance: The Revolution is Real

If macroeconomics provides the fuel, corporate governance is the engine. The change in tone over the last 24 months is nothing short of revolutionary. The days of polite nods and inaction are over. The Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) and the Financial Services Agency (FSA) have fundamentally altered the incentives.

The “Name and Shame” Regime

In March 2023, the Tokyo Stock Exchange released directives on how companies should improve their valuations by providing Price-to-Book (P/B) improvement plans.

Foreign observers who don’t understand Japan dismissed the TSE’s Cost of Capital Directive as there was no legal ramifications.

What they don’t understand is that in Japan, the threat of being named and shamed is more powerful than any punishment...

The exchange proved this by publishing a list of compliant companies, effectively isolating those who hadn’t disclosed P/B improvement plans.

By late 2025, over 90% of Prime Market companies had fallen in line.

The Unwinding of Cross-Shareholdings (Mochiai)

Cross-shareholding has been the poison pill of Japanese capitalism, companies holding shares in their clients and banks to cement relationships and insulate management.

• The Catalyst: The FSA has pressured the mega-banks and insurers to liquidate these holdings to zero.

• The Value Unlock: When a company sells a cross-shareholding, it converts a low-return asset (a stagnant stock) into cash. It then faces pressure to return that cash to its own shareholders. This creates a “double compounding” effect: the seller becomes leaner and more capital efficient, and the cash is recycled into the market via buybacks.

In 2024, share buybacks hit a record ¥18 trillion. In 2025, the pace accelerated further and will likely continue accelerating throughout 2026.

Which Sectors are Worth Investing In?

Read more

Executive Summary

Suzuki Motors is a company that really caught my interest when I saw just how high their profit growth has been, hitting a record ¥529 billion in net income with industry-leading 11.0% operating margins.

It stood out starkly against the other Japanese automakers, but the real hook came when I saw just how successful they have been at breaking into the Indian market, the fastest-growing car market in the world. In December 2025 alone, they posted 37% YoY growth, moving 182,000 units in a single month.

While competitors struggle for low-margin relevance, Suzuki has built a near-monopoly with a ~40% market share in a demographic superpower (that on top of its insane growth has a government that does everything to slow down the imports of Chinese cars). By combining a fortress balance sheet holding ¥1.17 trillion in cash , a subscription-like ecosystem in India via Maruti Suzuki (servicing 27 million vehicles annually), and a valuation of just 11.8x P/E that treats it like a stagnant exporter rather than a high-growth emerging market play, I believe Suzuki might just be the most interesting Japanese car company today.

Table of Contents

• Pillar 1: The Narrative

• Pillar 2: The Moat (Qualitative Analysis)

• Pillar 3: The Financial Engine (Quantitative Analysis)

• Pillar 4: The Margin of Safety (Valuation)

• Pillar 5: The Inversion (Risks & Verdict)

• KonichiValue Score

  ---

Pillar 1: The Narrative

Read more

Read more

Read more